Will "Do reasoning models use their scratchpad like..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
2
Ṁ132027
15%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2025 Review resolves in February 2027.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Do reasoning models use their scratchpad like we do? Evidence from distilling paraphrases is one of the top fifty posts of the 2025 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000and
3.00
1,0003.00Related questions
Related questions
Will "Do models say what they learn?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Lsusr's Rationality Dojo" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
17% chance
Will "The Leopold Model: Analysis and Reactions" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Compact Proofs of Model Performance via Mecha..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Language Models Model Us" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Sch..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Ablations for “Frontier Models are Capable of..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
15% chance
Will "Mechanistically Eliciting Latent Behaviors in..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "The Standard Analogy" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "The case for more ambitious language model evals" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
12% chance