Resolution criteria

Resolves “Yes” if, before 23:59 GMT on 31 Dec 2030, UK-wide legislation in force makes it illegal to wear full-face coverings (e.g. niqab, burqa, balaclava) in public spaces (streets, public transport, shops, schools, government buildings, etc.).

‣ Allowed exemptions may cover health, occupational safety, weather, performance or temporary emergency rules, but must not grant a standing religious exemption.

‣ Source: legislation.gov.uk text or confirmation by reputable media.

‣ Regional by-laws, protest-only powers, or bills that never commence do not count.

Background

As of July 2025, the UK has no national law prohibiting the wearing of full-face coverings in public spaces. However, there have been legislative actions and public discussions on this topic:

• Protest Laws: In February 2024, the UK government introduced laws granting police the authority to arrest protesters who wear face coverings to conceal their identities and avoid prosecution. This measure targets face coverings used during protests, not general public use. (gov.uk)

• Parliamentary Motions: In June 2025, an Early Day Motion was tabled in the UK Parliament calling for a ban on full-face coverings, including the burqa and niqab, in public spaces. Early Day Motions are formal motions submitted for debate in the House of Commons but are not indicative of forthcoming legislation. (edm.parliament.uk)

• Public Opinion: Surveys have shown varying levels of public support for banning full-face veils. For instance, a 2016 YouGov poll indicated that 57% of British respondents favoured such a ban. (thenews.com.pk)

Considerations

• European Context: Several European countries, including France, Belgium, and Austria, have implemented bans on full-face veils in public spaces. These bans have been justified on grounds of security, social cohesion, and secularism. (bbc.com)

• Legal and Cultural Factors: The UK's approach to religious attire has traditionally emphasised individual freedoms and multiculturalism. Any move towards banning full-face coverings would likely involve significant legal and societal debates, balancing security concerns with rights to religious expression.