If it’s a news story, it must quote or describe the actual contents of the report, or a draft of the report, not “according to sources familiar with the report.”
If they publish the report (even if only other House or Senate members can read it) resolves YES.
Note for interested bettors I have high trust in the vetting process used by "mainstream media" reporters and their attorneys, if something appears in print in e.g. the New York Times I am going to assume it is true and not that the reporters are just making something up.
1,000
3.00This is not evidence to resolve YES - it's the contents of the testimony, not the contents of the report, and no evidence the reporters have seen it, vs. heard it described https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/19/us/politics/matt-gaetz-hack-testimony.html?unlocked_article_code=1.bE4.f2SX.A-EoaFu8nQma&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
Throw as many crazy nominees to the wall and see what sticks.