Resolves to the winner of Masters league season 24.
@HillaryClinton @MingCat wanna fill my limitorder on semiotic? YES at 45%
@Jessef0226 @travis What are your thoughts? You guys are predicted to lose, even though you're in 1st and 3rd. #Whales
Shameless plug to prove a point:
https://manifold.markets/HillaryClinton/will-anyone-with-a-net-worth-below
@HillaryClinton Well I can't really blame my net worth because my cash balance hasn't dropped below 200k since election night. I'm just not very good at finding big trades.
@HillaryClinton Well I could spend more time hunting for trades, but I already take every profitable trade that I can find.
@brod What are your thoughts on the pay to win nature of this? You have any stats on the correlation between net worth and chance of winning?
@HillaryClinton I don’t have any stats but there’s definitely a correlation, net worth compounds
Ideally if leagues are designed to measure skill you’d want to judge on risk-adjusted percentage returns, not raw profits. Otherwise you can max your win probability without any skill by coin flipping as a whale
But raw profit is a schelling point, no one’s gonna disagree how to measure it, other exchanges do it… idk
@brod I feel like percent return should be a component instead of purely raw gains. Otherwise most people have 0% chance of winning unless they do a coin flip.
Like right now Jesse and Travis are doing really well, but will never be predicted to win because their net worths are too low.
high percent return also gets harder as your networth grows so idk. correlation between high net worth and chance of winning is very high bc both are caused by being good, but i'd be curious ab the diff in correlation if you only take ppl with high networth because they won a coinflip, or bc they bought mana, rather than amassing it over hundreds of markets
@Bayesian yeah scaling is a skill in itself, M10k profit is more impressive if you have M100k net worth than M1mil but 1% profits is more impressive on M1mil than M100k
net worth does measure skill but also time on the site and luck to an extent
@brod I'm not an expert on these things, but something like 50% profit, 50% ROI would be fairer. Sure, in the super long run things will even out, but that takes years.
@Bayesian correlation is very high over years. But Month to month, it's much easier for a whale to win.
If I give two equally skilled players 100k and 200k, the 200k person is going to win more in raw points.