If I'm understanding correctly Community Notes would count if X prioritized/ boosted the accurate posts?

@SimranRahman or penalised the inaccurate ones?

@SimranRahman Yeah, community notes could count. Right now engagement is still prioritized for post amplification on X though. They also don't meet the 1 Billion user mark.

Who judges if a statement is truthful?

@MichaelVoss -- The product features should build transparency about why something is considered truthful and thus amplified (e.g. Community Notes provide a venue to qualify/challenge claims). For the purposes of the question, I'd consider product features that prioritize and amplify that transparency around that reasoning above simple 'engagement' to be a yes.

Something like a brier score for users based on past claims, visible error estimates, or prediction markets embedded into post structures would be sufficient for the question to resolve Yes. Though, I would anticipate there are other ways users could be rewarded for accuracy above engagement. The crucial component is transparency in a truth prioritized rationale for amplifying a post.

Does that address the main idea of your question in your opinion?

Edited: Typos.

Can you outline what you consider the major social media networks?

@Ramble Yeah, I'll just be explicit. I used this article to assess current monthly active users: https://buffer.com/library/social-media-sites/amp/.

I arbitrarily set 1 billlion MAU as a threshold. Facebook, WhatsApp, Youtube, Instagram, WeChat, and Tiktok meet that threshold right now.

So to resolve Yes: a company with greater than 1 Billion MAUs would have to make the previously defined product changes. For the purposes of this question, if a new social media company is created around prioritization of truth over controversy then I would resolve the question as Yes as well. In addition if a company with less than 1 Billion MAUs makes truth prioritizing changes and then surpasses 1 Billion MAUs; I would also resolve the question as Yes.