Background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Nord_Stream_pipeline_sabotage
Multiple answers will be chosen if more than one actor is involved. “Involved” means has knowledge of the event and contributed to the sabotage prior to its happening.
Resolves when there is a clear actor beyond a reasonable doubt.
1,000
3.00German authorities issue a European arrest warrant for Zhuravlev
Poland doesn't execute the warrant; instead warns Zhuravlev
He flees to Ukraine
Donald Tusk says something on Twitter about how Nord Stream was a bad idea from the start
I think this is pretty clear?
@tmk Russia avoided a lot of very large fines that would have begun very soon after the explosions. So many had motive! Russia, Ukraine, US, Poland, Belarus, Turkey etc etc
According to leaked documents posted online, the U.S. had information that Ukraine was planning to attack the Baltic Sea gas links three months before the explosions, the Washington Post reported last year.
(from the Politico article in the oldest comment)
@Philip3773733 From the description:
“Involved” means has knowledge of the event and contributed to the sabotage prior to its happening.
Which I had interpreted as meaning either had knowledge, or contributed. But I'm not sure if that's what was intended.
Can you clarify, @wglane ?
@Primer they had knowledge of a plot to do it on a different date and tried to stop them. But not about this particular operation.
@MateuszSkrzypek why would you add this answer when both Poland and Ukraine are represented and multiple answers can resolve "yes"?
@MateuszSkrzypek "Multiple answers will be chosen if more than one actor is involved"
Poland and Ukraine are already there
Don't know who added a person instead of a state/institution but: