Giving a missile is not particularly instantaneous; will this resolve using the time when the offer was signed (and what if that's unknown), when the missile crossed the border (unlikely to be known either) or what?

Asking this because it's particularly likely that a target in a NATO country is hit because of Taurus shipment.

@AnT "Asking this because it's particularly likely that a target in a NATO country is hit because of Taurus shipment." -- this is bullshit

@MalachiteEagle you're very welcome to bet against, on I don't know which market.

https://www.ft.com/content/c8c53a95-fbad-440a-bc57-5802e85c5328

What about a strike on NATO the Russians claim was intended for Ukraine, but strayed too far west?

@JussiVilleHeiskanen seems that counts

In the few days following Scholz's phone call to Putin, Russia has responded with a massive missile barrage targeted at Ukrainian civilians, and by cutting an undersea cable between Germany and Finland.

Are you people really betting it it is more likely to see a Russian missile attack on a NATO country than Germany providing Taurus to Ukraine? Maybe the Taurus will not be given, but Russian attack on NATO should be much less likely, no?

@JuhoPennanen the fewer weapons Germany gives to Ukraine the greater the likelihood of an attack on a NATO country.