Will there be an anti-Trump protest march with at least 1m reported total participants in the US before 1st June 2025?
➕
Plus
211
Ṁ86k
Jun 1
59%
chance

Has to happen in a single day. Similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Women's_March which reported between 3,267,134 and 5,246,670 total participants in the US. I'll resolve based on a consensus of credible media sources and/or wikipedia.

  • Update 2025-02-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Anti-Trump Protest Definition Clarification

    • A protest does not need to be solely a demonstration against the person of Donald Trump. It is sufficient if it is motivated by his policy positions, rhetoric, or their perceived impact.

    • For example, the Women's March qualifies as an anti-Trump protest because it was prompted by Trump’s policy positions and rhetoric.

  • Update 2025-04-06 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Eligible Protest Clarification:

    • Any type of protest qualifies: The event does not need to be a march; any protest is sufficient as long as it is motivated by Trump’s policy positions, rhetoric, or their perceived impact.

    • Example Provided: The Women’s March is given solely as an example of a protest that would qualify

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00


Sort by:
3d

Perfect seismograph market.

bought Ṁ100 YES5d

It's unclear to me whether the turnout has to be in a single location.

5d

@Kynakwado Not if the Women's march qualifies, which it unequivocally does.

5d

@JamesBaker3 Yeah the Women's March was neither all in one spot, nor 100% marching, so it's pretty clear that those concerns from the comments won't be an issue.

boughtṀ4,000YES
reposted6d
bought Ṁ4,000 YES6d
6d

@DavidFWatson ChatGPT is not a reliable source. Did you read any of the articles it linked?

6d

@jumpman_folder I looked at the cited Wikipedia article, The number of cited cities, and looked at crowd size pictures for a few. Shall we try to add them all up, I agree that’s a reasonable follow up.

5d

@Siebe those are about 1% of their metro populations. I see 144 cities on the Wikipedia list. That might cover 250 million people, leading us to 2.5 million protesters. This doesn’t account for variations in partisanship though. (I haven’t had time to further check individual protests obviously)

5d

@DavidFWatson I appreciate the attempt at an estimate, but this doesn't take into account selection bias - these are probably the biggest protests proportional their population. For example, this implies a 200K protest in New York, which definitely didn't happen

5d

@Siebe fair enough, the nyc one looks a fair bit smaller

4d

@jumpman_folder thanks, that would imply a much lower density, or the map tool being wrong. I did mark the area right..

6d

Are people betting this down because there are going to be at least two of these protests, and they want to argue that that isn't "an" anti-Trump protest?

opened a Ṁ300 YES at 55% order6d

@Panfilo the fact that this hasn’t resolved “yes” yet might indicate that something screwy is going on with the author’s beliefs about what qualifies

6d

@DavidFWatson I'd guess an official reliable number still seems needed. When is the second protest?

@AndrewMcKnight that’s not what the market description requires. consensus/Wikipedia is sufficient. Why does there need to be a second one?

6d

@Panfilo I dumped my YES shares because CNN and other mainstream publications switched from reporting “millions of people” to “scores of people”

6d

@jumpman_folder Damn guess it was only 60 or 80 or so folks

bought Ṁ150 YES7d

"Hands off" protests reporting should be checked, I think it might resolve this YES?

filled a Ṁ190 YES at 55% order7d
sold Ṁ379 YES7d

@Twig Oh - but the Hands Off protests are not a march. Subtle!

7d

@dlin007 What do you mean by "March" in this question? Or is any protest sufficient?

7d

@Twig any protest is sufficient, yes. the women's march was just an example of what would qualify

@dlin007 Thank you!

Wikipedia now cites claims of 3 million for Hands Off, from both organizers directly and organizers via CNN, though it does not yet make the attendance claim itself.

7d

@Twig The CNN article is simply quoting the organizers. They didn't verify the attendance.

7d

@TimothyJohnson5c16 That is correct. I regret not making this more clear, and have edited my comment now. I appreciate the correction!

6d

@JoshuaPhillipsLivingReaso this is going to be tricky to get a reliable estimate on!

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules